Temporary Post Used For Theme Detection (f35c102b-3351-4480-a8cb-7ba156832378 – 3bfe001a-32de-4114-a6b4-4005b770f6d7)

This is a temporary post that was not deleted. Please delete this manually. (56e107f0-f3e5-4ccb-8b56-3cafe9aedaee – 3bfe001a-32de-4114-a6b4-4005b770f6d7)

Nigerian Christians Kill and Eat Muslims

Highlight: BBC reporter, Rob Walker witnesses Christian cannibalism {Audio link below}
At a point as the flesh is being roasted, someone says in Hausa language “…ni zuciyan na ke so…” meaning: “I want the heart”, while another person goes further to ask “…ka sa gishiri?” meaning: “…did you put some salt”?

You will Not see this news on any other news media! That is why we are your News Rescue!

September 29th, 2011

Birom Christians roasting their victims to eat NewsRescue- Jos, is one of the greatest epicenters of Muslim-Christian hate and intolerance in Nigeria.

Roughly torn between Muslims and Christians, it is at the epicenter of sectarian violence.

North Nigeria as a whole is stricken with some of the highest poverty levels in the world. With a 70-89% poverty level, this region compares with countries like Somalia, Eritrea and Bangladesh, while in contrast, South Nigeria, responsible for 90% of Nigeria’s bank deposits and loans, compares economically to countries like China and Korea. Due to the poverty prevalence figures, Nigeria’s former Central bank governor, Professor Soludo rightly concluded that the nation’s “very high level of poverty is essentially a Northern Phenomenon”

Related: NewsRescue- Poverty in the North – A “Mayday” Call

Birom Christian youth burn cars and eat Muslims {NaijaPals}

It is well known that poverty, ignorance and disease are a dangerous triad. This deadly ignorance was again demonstrated on the 28th of August; Birom (Berom) Christians were recorded in this video, eating Muslims they had killed and roasted. The event occurred when Christians surrounded Muslims observing their Eid annual holy devotion. Due to a miscommunication with the police, there was no usual requested security at the venue, a necessity in polar Jos. Christian youth surrounded the praying Muslims, burned their cars, pelted them and then killed, roasted and ate some.

—

Follow this link for gruesome pictures we can not post on this site: NaijaPals.com-Christians Massacre Muslims on Sallah Day (Graphic pictures, please!)

Zainab Usman, translating the video said:

At a point as the flesh is being roasted, someone says in Hausa language “…ni zuciyan na ke so…” meaning: “I want the heart”, while another person goes further to ask “…ka sa gishiri?” meaning: “…did you put some salt”? The large crowd’s visible complicity and excitement as they eagerly anticipate their cannibalistic feast marks a descent in our collective sense of humanity in Nigeria. What I find most ironic is that these butchers and party are communicating in Hausa language, the language of their slain “enemy” or rather, their “meal” and not their own native berom language. The presence of a police vehicle in the area where the “feasting” and cannibalism on slaughtered Muslims is taking place raises questions. The police should be protecting people, maintaining law and order and stopping any criminal activity from taking place, shouldn’t they? Of course as the video shows, this is not the case.

—

BBC reports also earlier in April about the cannibalism, sectarian violence and segregation in Jos; at 11 minutes, BBC’s Rob Walker witnesses roasted Muslims being eaten {Audio link- click here}. Transcript of this audio is appended below.

Not a single prosecution!- BBC

There is no record of a single successful prosecution related to these heinous crimes. This impunity for acts of violence helps explain why the cycle of revenge and counter-revenge has continued.

Ethnic violence is apparently not a crime in Nigeria. In fact, in this video, the police are seen literally being part of the Sapien flesh festival.

Related: NewsRescue- The Solution for Boko; Also- Solution to Nigeria riots

Social welfare system, the simple solution

Essentially in all industrialized nations, and a fundamental principle of existence, preached by the prophet of Islam and observed from the life of Jesus, is the social welfare system. Societies must provide for its citizens who do not have jobs and the ability or know-how to feed themselves. Men are not made equal in capacity. The wealthy must be taxed to feed the poor, and then there is natural resource. With the level of wealth of Nigeria, a world major oil exporter, a method of social identity and a comprehensive welfare system should have long been in place. Yes, just food money. In the US it is called ‘food stamps’. Stop the food stamps and there will be terrorism and anarchy.

Related: NewsRescue, 01/11/2012- Boko Haram terror group leader speaks on youtube

The fight for land between farmers and cattle-rearers – with increased urbanization, fuels sectarian crises. Government needs address grazing issues. Politicians also create and sponsor inter-cultural violence and terror to control wards. Do-or-kill politics is a serious issue in Africa. Related: Democracy Fails Africa

There must also be accountability and culpability for criminality, with an effective, efficient and respectable security system. These issues must be addressed by the government, however Nigeria’s government is so entrenched in corruption and the personal usurping of Nigeria’s wealth, that they have left conditions beyond words.

—

BBC broadcast transcript-

At 12 minutes, several of them clearly admitted to eating (chopping) the pieces of roasted human flesh he saw with them that they brought home to the Christian sector. They were very happy and glad in their expression. Certainly cannibalistic.

Rob: This is the christian community here, and there is a very large group of people gathered….that is the army firing in the air, stones are being thrown, rocks are being thrown. Crowd is now dispersing rapidly. Rob: What about this body here, who is this body here?

Christian 1.Yah, This is Muslim body….people that brought the bomb?

Rob: So you are saying this body which is being burned is People that brought the bomb?

Christian 1: Yah, yah, that is the body.

Rob: But there is no legs or arm or head…

Christian 1: We are chopping the meat, we are chopping the meat!
Christian Lady: some eat
Christian 2: And some…eat it
Christian Lady: And some of it eat
Christian 1: We eat it
Christian 3: We eat the meat!

Rob: Some of the people here eat it?

Christian 1: Yes
Christian 2: Really, really!

Rob: But why will you do that, why will you eat the meat

Christian 1: Why will we not chop the meat?
Christian 1: We need to fight them
Christian 2: Why won’t we chop it
Christian 3: That’s why we chop it.

Rob: There is a man now with a part of the body on a stake, he raised it up. Will there be peace now?

….Christians:…..the Hausa doesn’t want peace…we want the soldier to go, we need peace, Rob: but the soldiers protect…. Christians: the soldiers should go let the battle be once and forever…..

Rob: Reports of isolated cases like this of Christian youth burning and eating the flesh of their enemies emerged in in Jos 3 months ago. Some residents say it is a means of humiliating opponents. Others say it is a way of binding together those involved in the violence. Whatever the case it gives you some idea of the extremes of the violence here. The police say they weren’t sure who the target of the bomb attack. What is sure is if it wasn’t for the heavy presence of the Nigerian army, the violence will be much worse here.

Finally he goes to a noble community in Jos where Muslims and Christians live in peace, cooperate and protect each other, and they explain that the prevalence of violence and rioting in other areas is likely politically motivated by politicians who live in secure, rich areas and set up these ignorance and poverty clashes. They said it may be Christians pretending to be Muslims bombing Christians and likewise Muslims pretending to be Christians bombing Muslims, all as agents of wicked politicians, acting under the umbrella of religion and taking advantage of the poverty in the region..  …The politicians push out opponents in their area for instance with these attacks, so they can win elections.

A resident of Shen in Jos, an area rift with violence, Dogo Yahya commented: Jesus recommended turning the other cheek, and the Muslim Quran says- whoever takes an innocent life, it’s as though has killed the entire human race, and whoever saves a life, it’s comparable to saving the entire world. These people who do these on both sides are neither Muslims, nor Christians! They…. workers of iniquity!

Nigerians should compete in doing good

The Muslim Quran, in chapter 5:48 says what means:

To each of you We prescribed a law and a method. Had Allah(The Lord) willed, He would have made you one nation [united in religion], but [He intended] to test you in what He has given you; so Vie, then with one another in doing good works. To Allah is your return all together, and He will [then] inform you concerning that over which you used to differ.

The Christian Bible also clearly encourages peace, tolerance and forgiveness. We at NewsRescue encourage Nigerians to embrace a war of righteousness with weapons of peace, love and compassion.

Related: NewsRescue- The End of Boko Haram

More video:

This first clip shows the hundreds of vehicles of the Muslims who went to observe Sallah prayers, burned by Christian youths.

The links below are short video clips recorded by Christian Youths in Jos, Nigeria after they had killed, roasted and chopped the Hausa-Fulani Muslims during their prayer session at an Eid Praying ground on the 29th of August 2011.

Source :

Honor killing was Inspired from Bible….

Honor Killings in the Bible

 

Many Christians are often fond of accusing Muslims of committing several honor killings in the name of Islam; they then use this line of argument as a reason to discredit Islam in their eyes. In this article we shall once again turn the table on the Christian showing that honor killings can be found in the Bible, and that the Bible is for honor killings! Hence by their own criteria, Christians will have to abandon their own book.

Let us now see the honor killings in the Bible:

Lev 21:9  And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire.

 

 

So note, if the priests daughter commits a bad sexual act, she is to be burned because of her fathers reputation, because it is against his honor. What will Christian say now? This is one example of honor killing in the Bible, in fact the act is ordered by the Bible itself.

“And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death. (Exodus 21:17)”

“For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him. (Leviticus 20:9)”

 

So here the children are put to death for insulting their parents,

this is another example of honor killings,

the children are put to death for dis-honoring their very own parents and the punishment is death.

So we have seen 3 examples of honor killings in the Bible, so since Christians always have a problem with honor killings and say Islam is wrong because of some Muslims who commit this act, then the Bible is also wrong for allowing honor killings which also makes their own God wrong, and if God is wrong then he cant God because God is always correct. Either way the Christian is in a bad dilemma.

Authors of Bible – Old Testament

Book	Author By Tradition	Author By Conjecture	Conjectural Editor
Genesis	Moses	(Yahwist + Elohist) + Priest*	Ezra*
Exodus	Moses	(Yahwist + Elohist) + Priest*	Ezra*
Levitcus	Moses	Priest*
Numbers	Moses	(Yahwist + Elohist) + Priest*	Ezra*
Deuteronomy	Moses (found by Hilkiah)	Deuteronomist [Jeremiah & Baruch]*	Ezra (slightly)*
Joshua	Joshua	Yahwist + Elohist*	Jeremiah & Baruch*
Judges	Samuel	Yahwist + Elohist*	Jeremiah & Baruch*
Ruth	Samuel	?
1 Samuel	Samuel + Gad? + Nathan?	Yahwist + Elohist*	Jeremiah & Baruch*
2 Samuel	Samuel + Gad? + Nathan?	Yahwist + Elohist*	Jeremiah & Baruch*
1 Kings	Jeremiah?	Annals of the Kings of Israel & Judah (Ch. 1&2 by Yahwist)*	Jeremiah & Baruch*
2 Kings	Jeremiah?	Annals of the Kings of Israel & Judah*	Jeremiah & Baruch*
1 Chronicles	Ezra + Nehemiah?	Chronicler (Ezra?)*
2 Chronicles	Ezra + Nehemiah?	Chronicler (Ezra?)*
Ezra	Ezra	Ezra + Nehemiah
Nehemiah	Nehemiah	Ezra + Nehemiah
Esther	Mordecai? (495-479 B.C.)	? (460-330 B.C.)
Job	Moses?	various authors
Psalms	David+ (compiled by Hezekiah)	compiled later	Ezra
Proverbs	Solomon+ (compiled by Hezekiah)	compiled later	Ezra
Ecclesiastes	Solomon (compiled by Hezekiah)	compiled later (250-200 B.C.)
Song of Songs	Solomon (compiled by Hezekiah)	compiled later (300-400 B.C.)
Isaiah	Isaiah	Isaiah (Ch. 1-39) + “Second Isaiah” (Ch. 40-66)
Jeremiah	Jeremiah & Baruch	Jeremiah & Baruch + “Second Jeremiah” (Ch.27b-29a,33b,39,mid49)
Lamentations	Jeremiah & Baruch	various authors
Ezekiel	Ezekiel	Ezekiel
Daniel	Daniel (580 B.C.)	? (165 B.C.)

*Based on Who Wrote the Bible?, by Richard Elliot Friedman, Prof. of Hebrew and Comparative Literature at the University of California, San Diego

“Yahwist”, “J” (848-722 B.C.)- author from Judah who wrote the majority of Genesis; refers to God as Yahweh; concentrates on stories of families, deception, sex, and violence; writes of angels, talking animals and prophetic dreams; portrays God in an anthropormorphic way in Genesis; refers to Mt. Sinai as Sinai and Moses’ father-in-law as Reuel; attributes the heresy at Peor to Moabite idolatry (Num. 25:1-5)

“Elohist”, “E” (747-722 B.C.)- author from Israel; refers to God as Elohim; priest of Shiloh: a priesthood that didn’t believe in animal sacrifice, was removed from power by Solomon and Jeroboam, and whose leader Abiathar was exiled by Solomon to the Aaronid city of Anathoth; revered Moses and Samuel and concentrated on the Exodus; unadmiring towards Aaron and the Aaronid priesthood; wrote the story of the bronze snake Nehushtan; refers to Mt. Sinai as Horeb and Moses’ father-in-law as Jethro; writes of Moses bringing water from a rock in Meribah (Ex. 17:6-7)

“Priest”, “P” (722-587 B.C.)- Aaronid priest from Jerusalem, probably from King Hezekiah’s time; refers only to Aaron as a prophet; recognized only Aaronites as priests rather than all Levites; concentrated on the laws of Moses and priestly duties; did not write on sacrifices until Moses; wrote as a reaction against the combined Yahwist-Elohist scripture; considered Jerusalem to be the only legitimate place to make sacrifice; wrote of God speaking to both Moses and Aaron and of the ‘staff of Aaron’ rather than the ‘staff of Moses’; wrote of Moses being punished for lack of faith when he brings water from a rock in Meribah (Num. 20:11-12); attributes the heresy at Peor to the marriage of Midianites in which God grants priesthood to Aaron’s grandson Phineas for killing a Jew/Midianite couple that practiced racial impurity and dared to flaunt it by entering the Tent of Meeting(Num. 25:6-16)

“Deuteronomist”, “D” (621 B.C.)- author of most of the text that is now Deuteronomy; Deuteronomy was believed by the early church fathers, including Jerome, to have been the book of law that was discovered in the temple in 621 BCE under the reign of King Josiah (2 Kings 22); greatly concerned with establishing the centrality of the temple to Jewish worship and with keeping the people on their guard against pagan influences; unadmiring towards Aaron, Solomon and Jeroboam; most scholars believe “D” is also responsible for editing and arranging the “Deuteronomositic History”, from Deuteronomy to 2 Kings; Hebrew scholar Richard Elliott Friedman identifies this author with Jeremiah and the Shiloh community due to focus and linguistic similarities

Isaiah (739-681 B.C.)- prophet during Hezekiah’s reign; preached against idolatry and emphasized repentance of sins instead of sacrifice; predicts the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians in 2 Kings 20:16-18

Jeremiah (627-587 B.C.)- priest of Shiloh from Anathoth, the city of exile; son of Hilkiah; dictated his writings as his scribe Baruch wrote them; similar to the perception in 2 Kings, Jeremiah revered King Josiah and wrote lamentations for him after the king was killed by Pharaoh Necho; wrote prophecies against Josiah’s son Jehoiakim; wrote that God never commanded sacrifice in Moses’ time (Jer. 7:22-23, 8:7-8); prophecized the destruction of Judah and their exile into Babylon; saved from stoning by Shapan’s son Ahikam; protected by his other son, Gedaliah, the governor appointed by King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon after the fall of Judah

“Chronicler” (627-587 B.C.)- Author who wrote Chronicles; Aaronid priest; recognized only Aaronites as priests rather than all Levites; concentrated on the laws of Moses and priestly duties; revered Solomon and King Hezekiah (2 Chr. 30:26); leaves out the sins of Solomon and how he split the kingdom as portrayed in 1 Kings 11; leaves out Isaiah’s prophecy against Hezekiah from 2 Kings 20:12-19 (2 Chr. 32:31); most scholars see Chronicler as copying from and less reliable than the author of 2 books of Kings

Daniel (580 B.C.; 165 B.C.)- The book of Daniel tells of a 6th-century Jewish prophet who becomes a dream reader in the royal court of Babylon, similar to the way Joseph read the dreams of Pharaoh; historical inaccuracies in the text make many scholars believe it was written in the Maccabean era, mistakes such as: the intervention of an unknown Median Empire between the Chaldean and Persian Empires led by a ‘Darius the Mede’ (believed by scholars to have been confused with the Persian king Darius), the book calling King Nebuchadnezzar the father of King Belshazzar (who was neither related nor reigned subsequent to him), a contradiction in the year Nebuchadnezzar beseiged Jerusalem (Dan. 1:1; 2 Kings 23:36), and a prediction that Antiochus Epiphanes of Syria would invade Egypt a second time, conquer it, and then die somewhere between Mediterranean Sea and Jerusalem (Dan. 11:44-45)- none of which happenned- he died in Persia (1 Macc. 6:1-6); scholars date the composition as being written between the last correct ‘prediction’ (167-165 B.C.) and the tyrant’s death (164 B.C.)

Ezra- (550-450 B.C.) Aaronid priest who was given authority by the Persian emperor Artaxerxes to instruct the Jews in Jerusalem on the law (Ezra 7:10-14) Promulgated a creed that included sources from all four of the sources that made up the first five books of Moses (Yahwist, Elohist, Priest, and Deuteronomist), as told in Nehemiah 8; Richard Elliott Friedman conjectures that he interwove the (already combined) Yahwist/Elohist text with the Priestly text and Deuteronomy to produce the Torah.

“Second Isaiah” (546-538 B.C.)- believed to have written Ch. 40-66; these chapters make references to the destruction of Jerusalem but whether it is in past or future tense is uncertain; prophecizes about a suffering servant and the fall of Babylon

Nehemiah (445-433 B.C.)- governor of Judea from 445 to 433 B.C.

“Second Jeremiah” (464 B.C.-70 A.D.)- The Hebrew book of Jeremiah was edited by a Levite from the Second Temple times in order to make it look like Jeremiah accepted Levitical sacrifice as legitimate (Jer.33:17-18); he switched around some of Jeremiah’s chapters as well as added his own; the original version was recorded in both the Greek Septuagint (250 B.C.) and the Dead Sea Scrolls (200 B.C.-68 A.D.), but is unmarked in most Bibles

Quranic Discription of Mary Virginal Conception

Sam the greatest liar of 21century is accusing Quran to describe the miraculous conception of Jesus in a very graphic way. His accusation can be divide into following categories.

1- Quran uses the term ‘farj’ which is a person’s private [here Mary’s vagina] part in the context of conception of Jesus.

2- The conception of Jesus (peace be upon him) in the Quran, as described by the Tafasir is gross and abusive.

3- To whom the Quran refer in 66:12 as ‘he’.

Before I start, I want to inform the readers that when I am going to use the word ‘God’ to refer to ‘Allah’ and ‘Yaweh’for the God of the Bible.

Refutation of Allegation #1:

Sam claims that Quran uses the word ‘farj’ to mean Mary’s vagina and he furthur twisted the translations alleges that Allah breathed into Mary’s vagina through angel Gabriel. He quoted the verses of the Quran which talks about how Maryam (A.S) got pregnant. He quoted Surah 21:90-91,66:12 regarding the verses of Maryam’s conception of Jesus (A.S). To further cement his claim he also quoted 24:30-31 and 23:125 to mean ‘farj’ as private parts. For the sake of brevity, I would quote only 21:90-91 which talks about the conception of Jesus.

The verse says:

????????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ????? ???????????????

And [mention] the one who guarded her chastity, so We blew into her [garment] through Our angel [Gabriel], and We made her and her son a sign for the worlds.

Farj – used as an honour:

None of the translators uses the word vagina while translating the word farj which is confirmed here . About the other verses, they are also translated as chastity not private parts , proof here .

The angel breathed into the garment of Maryam (A.S) not in her vagina.

So doesn’t farj means a person’s private area?

Yes it does! But only when it is referring to private parts like in one of the Hadith (Sunan of Abu Dawud, Book 11, Number 2126). Arabs sometimes refer to farj in the context of chastity or honor. A narration below is one of the few examples.

A Shiite Muslim, Al-Kulayni (d. 329 A.H.) records;

?? ??? ??????? (?) ?? ????? ?? ????? ????: ?? ??? ??? ??????

It is narrated from Abu Abdullah –on his be peace- he said about the marriage of Umm Kulthum. So he said: “That this was the honor (farj) that was coerced from us” (al-Kafi 5/494 Narration no. 9536. Al-Majlisi has accepted it as authentic)

Now here Abu Abdullah (i.e. Hassain bin Ali) is talking about his sister Umm Kulthum and it needs no elaboration that a brother –who is a learned imam- would refer to his sister as ‘honor’ and will never refer to her privacy even in his imagination, let alone mention it to others.

Farj- used as an opening [here of the garment]:

Commentators use the word farj here as a narrow opening of Maryam’s garment [not vagina since every garment has opening and it makes more sense] not vagina because the word for vagina is ‘mahbil’, if angel blew into the Maryam’s vagina the word ‘mahbil’ would have been used but that’s not the case, use of the word farj has opened the gates of two meanings. According To Lane’s lexicon ‘farj’ also means an opening.

It is unanimously agreed by commentators that the term ‘farj’ here means ‘the narrow opening of Maryam’s garment’. Some of the examples include:

1. Al-Tabari (d. 310 A.H.) states, “It is the opening of her garment.” (Tafsir al-Tabari, 23/500).

2. Al-Qurtubi (d. 671 A.H.) says it refers her garment and not her private part. (Tafsir Al-Jami’ al-Ahkam al-Qur’an, 18/203)

3. Al-Zamakhshari (d. 538 A.H.) states it’s about her garment. (Tafsir al-Kashshaf 4/573)

4- Al-Suyuti (d. 911 A.H.) says the very same. (Tafsir Jalalayn 1/754)

Refutation of allegation #2:

Let us jump to Surah 19:22-23, where a similar verse describes the conception of Isa (peace be upon him) and let us see the relevant commentary of Tafsir Ibn Kathir in this regard. Note the word farj isn’t used in this verse; Surah 19:22-23 says,

“And she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a far place. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, “Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten.”

Ibn Kathir’s commentary:

Ibn Kathir remarks on these verses: “Allah, the Exalted, informs about Maryam that when Jibril had spoken to her about what Allah said, she accepted the decree of Allah. Many scholars of the predecessors (Salaf) have mentioned that at this point the angel (who was Jibril) blew into the opening of the garment [farj which also means an opening] that she was wearing. Then the breath descended until it entered into her vagina and she conceived the child by the leave of Allah.” (Online Source)

First we should dig in the term ‘spirit’. Tafsir Al-Jalalayn while commenting on S 38:72 defines it as something that gives life, from a hadith (Sahih Bukhari, Book #55, Hadith #549) that says that an angel come to write about a person’s lifetime and then blow his spirit to give life to fetus which is in the womb, similarly God of the bible also blew into Adam’s nostrils [Genesis 2:7]. It would be foolish to say that God love to breath in someone’s nostrils,Adam was there with God but Eisa (peace be upon him) was to nourish in the womb of Maryam (A.S). The breath itself reaches the uterus through vagina [as in case of Adam it was his nose, so it’s just an opening into the body] as this is only opening into the uterus!

Now it’s not mentioned anywhere that embryo Eisa was there in the womb when it happened. If you read furthermore, the Tafsir ibn Kathir says.

“After this, her menstrual bleeding ceased and she experienced what the pregnant woman experiences of sickness, hunger, change of color and there was even a change in the manner of her speech.”

It means Eisa (peace be upon him) wasn’t there in the womb of Virgin. Maryam(A.S) thus conceived her son through this breath which travelled through her vagina and into the uterus (womb), where Esa (peace be upon him) was nourished like every human born of a woman, Adam didn’t nourish in the womb of a female that’s why his spirit took the route of nostrils as the Bible says.

Refutation of allegation #3:

Sam in his gown of crusades alleged that to whom Quran refer to in 66:12, he remarked :

“The second problem is caused by the Arabic language. In Arabic, Allah does not say: ‘so we breathed into her of our spirit’, but ‘into him’. Who is it, into whom the spirit was breathed? The embryo ‘Isa? That is difficult to accept, for then ‘Isa would have existed in Mary’s womb already before the spirit was breathed into her. That would mean that Allah created ‘Isa before hand or that he existed before he was conceived. Both options are out of the question for Islamic scholars.

Who is it then, into whom the Spirit from Allah was breathed? IT IS ALMOST UNSPEAKABLE, but the last expression in the previous sentence, which is masculine in Arabic, IS THE EXPRESSION FOR MARY’S GENITALS. The literal meaning of Allah’s statement in Arabic is then, ‘so we breathed into her vagina [farj] of our spirit.’ This turns the stomachs of some of our readers.”

Surah 66:12 of the Quran reads:

?????????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ????? ??? ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ???????? ?????????? ????????? ???? ?????????????

Dr.Ghali: “And Maryam (Mary) daughter of Imran, who kept safe her private parts, (i.e., safeguarded) so We breathed in it of Our Spirit, and she sincerely (believed) in the Words of her Lord, and His Books; and she was one of the devout.”

Actually none of the translators translated as ‘unto him’ but as ‘there in(Pickthall) , in it (Dr.Ghali), into her (Yusuf Ali, Shakir)’.

Again the Sam is playing his dirty tricks to confuse the readers and exposes his bigot nature;

the word ????? (fihi) is used in this verse as a masculine singular object pronoun and means the farj[opening] of Maryam (A.S)’s sleeves or garments as garments are treated as masculine in Arabic. We have earlier proved that Isa (peace be upon him) wasn’t there in the womb of Maryam (A.S) and she conceived him after she received the breadth from Gabriel which blew into her garment not her vagina.

Lets See What Bible says about this

Before I come to the bone of contention i.e. Luke 1:35, let me reply to Sam’s argument on this verse.

Argument 1: The word come upon is used in Luke 2:25 and Luke 3:22, about Simon’s righteousness and Jesus’ baptism.

My Response: The Greek word used in Luke 1:35 is ?p????µa? (Strong’s G1904-eperchomai), and in context of spirit coming upon someone is used only in Luke 1:35 and Acts 1:8, but the spirit when came upon the disciples in acts, one of the disciples of Jesus Mary Magdalene didn’t conceive any baby so it must have come upon them in a different way. The Luke 1:35 uses this word for explaining the impregnation of Mary, as something is coming upon her as a husband come upon his wife.

Argument 2: Jesus was transfigured by clouds in Luke 9:34.

My Response: The term overshadow doesn’t always mean that a person is shadowed by some cloud, we should have to see the context also as to where and why the word is used and what possible meanings it may have, which I have discussed below.

Catholic assumption about Luke1:35 : The Catholic view about the birth of Jesus can be put in a nutshell by this simple picture.

Holy Ghost hovered over Mary exhorted creative energy on her womb while Yahweh was overshadowing her with clouds and boom! Jesus was conceived. Infact, early church fathers gave many theories which we will view in the later text and this isn’t the first place where God of the bible sounds pornographic, the intention of God to have martial relationship with his people is also reflected in.

In Ezekiel, God compares Bride Israel to a young woman, using some striking imagery to describe his love for her:

Then you grew up, became tall, and reached the age for fine ornaments; your breasts were formed and your hair had grown.Yet you were naked and bare.Then I passed by you and saw that you were ready for love; so I SPREAD MY CLOAK OVER YOU and covered your nakedness. I swore to you and entered into a covenant with you so that you became mine, declares the Lord God. – Ezekiel 16:7-8

The phrase “spread my cloak over you” was a Hebrew euphemism for conjugal relations (see Ruth 3:9). This passage should give us an idea of the basic goodness of the marital act as God designed and intended it.

Ruth 3:9 : And he said, Who art thou? And she answered, I am Ruth thine handmaid: SPREAD THEREFORE THY SKIRT OVER THINE handmaid; for thou art a near kinsman.

Barnes’ Notes on the Bible: Spread thy skirt … - The phrase indicates receiving and acknowledging her as a wife.

Due to the nebulous and somewhat graphical language of Luke 1:35 several theories are proposed depending which sect of Christianity you are talking about, since Catholics aren’t the only Christians in the scene.

Intimacy with Yahweh:

The language of Luke 1:35 made some Christians (Mormons) to believe that Yahweh was sexually involved with Mary. Luke 1:35 states, “The Holy Ghost shall come upon you and the power of the most high (Yahweh) will overshadow you. This makes some Christian to come to conclusion when Holy ghost came upon Mary she became unconscious and Jehovah had an intercourse with her.

To further explain as to why he reach this conclusion on Luke 1:35, he said,

Intimacy with Holy Ghost:

Luke 1:35 says that holy ghost will come upon Mary and the power of the most high will overshadowed her. A Christian source remarked, ‘overshadowed’ is just another delicate discreet way of saying a man got on top of a woman, casting his shadow over her, and entered her with his penis and ‘made love’ to her. This is just the good old-fashioned missionary way of producing babies. The woman gets ‘overshadowed’…or as King Solomon via the Holy Spirit said… His left hand is under my head, and his right hand doth embrace me. (Song of Solomon 2: 6) Because her lover is over top of her…. and he is overshadowing her …..’and his banner over me was love’ (2: 4).Do clouds penetrate into the womb ?…. Does gas produce babies ? The answer obviously NO. The Lord created sperm to break thru the egg of a woman to combine with the cell of a woman to reproduce into a new body for a new soul. That’s the Lord’s biology, that’s His embryology. That’s the Lord’s sexuality.

Mathew 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is CONCEIVED IN her is of the Holy Ghost.

And the conception happened INSIDE Mary’s womb.

Luke 2:21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was CONCEIVED IN THE WOMB.

Some Christians are of the view that Holy Ghost was the spouse of Mary. Can a spirit have sex with humans? According to a Christian source, there is a possibility, according toZohar [a book on Jewish kaablah] and the Alphabet of Ben Sira [wrote by Jesus bin Sirach], Lilith was Adam’s first wife who later became a succubus[female demon]. She left Adam and refused to return to the Garden of Eden after she mated with archangel Samael (who was an angel) and according to another source, even Pope Sylvester also had a sexual relationship with a succubus. However, Catholics kept this relationship in just spiritual realm;

Saint Maximillian Kolbe say that the relationship between the Spirit of God and the Theotokos is redolent of a marriage in the following ways: As a husband and wife become “one flesh” in marriage (Genesis 2:24) yet remain distinct persons, so Mary and the Spirit are two distinct persons who share a deep spiritual union. As human spouses cooperate in giving life to their children, so, analogously, the Spirit and Mary “cooperate” in communicating spiritual life to us. (H.M. Manteau-Bonamy, The Immaculate Conception and the Holy Spirit: The Marian Teachings of Saint Maximillian Kolbe (Libertyville, IL: Franciscan Marytown Pr, 1977 ) , So how does husband and wife become one? Of course after sexual intercourse .Levi Jones, associate pastor of theology in U.S.A see the impregnation of Mary analogous to Zeus’s relationship with Leda.

As said earlier it is possible that a spirit can have sexual relationship with a human. However, Jesus is refereed to son as the son of Yahweh i.e. born of Yahweh’s sperm or semen and the spirit act as a vector in transferring the sperms of Yahweh into Mary’s womb probably in an old fashioned way. We see that Holy Spirit can take physical forms such as dove, thus it possible that it came upon her and overshadowed her. According to a source, Holy Spirit is also designated as the most high and he was the one overshadowing her and ejaculating the seed of Yahweh into her. Some Christian may say if this copulation then Mary is no longer a virgin which goes against Isaiah 7:14, Oh really? The word used for defining the virginity of Mary in the New Testament is pa?????? (strong’s G3933-parthenos), however! It also mean a marriageable maiden; Infact in Septuagint, this term is also applied for woman who are already deflowered women and harlots.

As for Isaiah 7:14, the R.S.V. 1952 Bible which was produced by Thirty-two scholars of highest eminence, and reviewed by fifty representatives of cooperating denominations, gives its translation as;

“Behold a young woman shall conceive and bear a son and shall call his name Imman’u-el.”

And in the footnote to this verse it says;

“Young woman, Hebrew ‘almah, feminine of ‘elem, young man (1 Sam.17.56, 20.22); the word appears in Gen.24.43; Ex.2.8; Ps.68.25, and elsewhere where it is translated “young woman,” “girl,” “maiden.”

(The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version 1952, Edited by Herbert G. May and Bruce M. Metzger, Oxford University Press, New York 1962)

Intimacy with Gabriel and Jospeh:

In a book Unveiling God’s Presence in the Bible By Tommy C. SEAY, he claims that it was the angle Gabriel sexually involved with Mary and this claim is inspired by his holy ghost (pg297-301). Bible Review Magazine 1902-1903 By Harry et al Wright, he claims that when ghost came upon both both Mary and Joseph when they were in bed and clouds overshadowed them, they committed sex unconsciously and this how Jesus was born (pg.113-114). All these books can be read on Google books.

Strange Arts:

Early Church fathers unable to understand how Mary became impregnated with Jesus, posed different drawings. One of them was that a Yahweh is oozing semen from his mouth through a tube which is going beneath Mary’s skirt.

Summary & Conclusion:

Even the spirit brought the breath of God, there was no sex at all, the conception was totally spiritual etc etc. The point is that Luke 1:35 is at the time so graphic and nebulous that it made Christians to came up with some nasty and promiscuous thoughts about the conception. On the other hand, Quran is very clear and free of such imagery. Christians should check their own sources before criticizing ours. Infact, both Mathew and Paul never made any claim about the virgin birth, why? I leave this answer to the Christians.

Qur’an refers to Mary, the most chaste woman ever in the most excellent manner and in the language befitting the Divine Majesty. This is why Muslims never have had any graphical or immodest description of her conception, whereas the Biblical description speaks of a human mind behind the narrative which brings in a mental picture which has lead to all the non-sense shown above. And perhaps all this was a reflection of Greek mythology cf. Zeus’ relation with Leda.

Disclaimer! Whatever is given in the “Lets see What Bible says” section is just a showing of the mirror to Christian missionary haters of Islam otherwise neither the author of this post and nor any Muslim can ever think of anything remotely akin to it. No Muslim is a Muslim if he has any such imagination about the purest and greatest woman of all times.

Hidden Truth about the WTC 7 (3rd tower) Collapse on 9-11

Everyone remembers the Twin Towers exploding at 9:59AM and 10:28AM EDT on September 11, 2001. Comparatively few people can recall that there was a third massive skyscraper, also a part of the World Trade Center, which fell very rapidly to the ground on that day. This was World Trade Center Building 7.¹

One reason that few remember WTC Building 7’s collapse is that after September 11^th it has been treated, both in the media and in The 9/11 Commission Report, as if it didn’t happen.

“The total collapse of the third huge skyscraper late in the afternoon September 11^thwas reported as if it were an insignificant footnote… most people never saw video of Building 7’s collapse… Incredibly, it is virtually impossible to find any mention of Building 7 in newspapers, magazines, or broadcast media reports after September 11^th.” ²

“The Commission avoids another embarrassing problem – explaining how WTC 7 could have collapsed, also virtually at free-fall speed – by simply not mentioning the collapse of this building.” ³

The collapse of Building 7 at 5:20PM EDT was in itself a major event; the sudden and unexplained fall to earth of a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper is certainly news. Why has there been almost no mention of this in the U.S. media, and why was there no mention of Building 7’s collapse in The 9/11 Commission Report? These are questions of great significance, and they cry out for answers. To be able to approach any kind of explanation, however, first some pertinent and verified facts of the Building 7 aspect of 9/11 need to be scrutinized.

The following eleven facts have been compiled from the research of reputable sources – those who have dared to question and have devoted innumerable hours into discovering what really happened on 9/11.

FACT 1: WTC Building 7 was one of the largest buildings in downtown Manhattan. It was 47 stories tall, about half the height of the Towers, and took up an entire city block. It was 300 feet from the closest Twin Tower (the North Tower, WTC 1), and was a steel-framed, concretestructure.⁴

FACT 2: WTC Building 7 – on its 23^rd floor – housed an Emergency Command Center for the City of New York that Mayor Rudolph Giuliani had built in the mid-1990’s. On the morning of September 11^th, Mayor Giuliani did not go “to his Command Center – with its clear view of the Twin Towers – but to a makeshift, street-level headquarters at 75 Barkley Street.” WTC 7 also held the offices of numerous government agencies, including the Department of Defense, the CIA, the Secret Service, the IRS, and the Security and Exchange Commission.⁵ Late 2001 was the time of “the height of the investigation into Enron, so the majority of Enron’s SEC filings were likely destroyed when World Trade Center 7 came down.”⁶

FACT 3: WTC Building 7 was not hit by airplane or significant debris on September 11^th. It had been evacuated after the planes hit the towers. By the afternoon of September 11^th, there were a few small fires of unknown origin evident in the building, and these small fires could be seen in only a few of the hundreds and hundreds of windows in the building.⁷

FACT 4: On September 11, 2001, at 5:20PM, EDT, World Trade Center Building 7 suddenly and rapidly collapsed. Beginning with the penthouse, all 47 stories of it imploded into its own footprint in less than seven seconds. 

FACT 5: On September 16^th, NASA flew an airplane over the World Trade Center site, recorded infrared radiation coming from the ground, and created a thermal map. The U.S. Geological Survey analyzed this data, and determined the actual temperature of the rubble. This map shows that five days after the collapse of Building 7, the surface temperature of asection of its rubble was 1,341º F.⁸ This high a temperature is indicative of the use of explosives.

“WTC 7’s rubble pile continued to smolder for months.”⁹

FACT 6: Fire Engineering magazine is the 125-year-old paper-of-record of the fire engineering community. Bill Manning, editor-in-chief, wrote an Editor’s Opinion in the January, 2002 edition. His editorial, $elling Out the Investigation, pointed out that destruction of evidence – the hurried removal of rubble which should be examined by investigators – is illegal. He also issued a “call to action”. To quote excerpts:

“For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions … is on the slow boat to China …”

“I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall.”

“Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the ‘official investigation’ blessed by FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half baked farce [emphasis mine] that may have already been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members – described by one close source as a ‘tourist trip’ – no one’s checking evidence for anything.”

“The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.”

“Firefighters, this is your call to action. …contact your representatives in Congress and officials in Washington and help us correct this problem immediately.” ^10 11

FACT 7: In May of 2002, FEMA published their report #403 titled World Trade Center Building Performance Study. This report claims that the fires caused the building to collapse, but that the specifics of how this is supposed to have occurred “…remain unknown at this time.”¹²

FACT 8: The collapse of WTC Building 7 shows five characteristics of a controlled demolition:

1. It “dropped directly into its own footprint in a smooth, vertical motion”;

2. It “collapsed completely in less than seven seconds”;

3. “Dust streamed out of the upper floors of Building 7 early in its collapse”;

4. “WTC 7’s roof inverted toward its middle as the collapse progressed”; and

5. “WTC 7’s rubble was mostly confined to the block on which the building stood.”¹³

FACT 9: “Larry Silverstein is a rather large player within the realms of 21^st Century real estate, finance, and politics.”¹⁴ He “…had taken out a long lease on the World Trade Center only six weeks before 9/11. In a PBS documentary entitled ‘America Rebuilds’, originally aired in September of 2002, Silverstein made the following statement about Building 7:

‘I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, “We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.” And they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.’” ^15 16

FACT 10: “It is inconceivable that anyone could be running around placing explosives in exactly the right places all within seven hours. In fact, implosions take a minimum of two weeks and up to two months to plan and place the charges. The fire department of New York does not even train their personnel to do controlled demolition. They are done by highly skilled experienced specialists who plan and test far ahead.”¹⁷

FACT 11: “… [George W.] Bush’s brother, Marvin Bush, and his cousin, Wirt Walker III, were principles in the company [Stratesec, formerly named Securacom] that was in charge of security for the World Trade Center, with Walker being the CEO from 1999 until January 2002.”¹⁸

In summation: A major aspect of 9/11 has been excluded from the entire U.S. media after September 11^th, and was also omitted from The 9/11 Commission Report. This was the sudden fall to earth, on September 11^th, 2001, of World Trade Center Building 7. Not hit by airplane or significant debris, 300 feet from the closest Twin Tower, and with just a few small fires burning within it, at 5:20PM EDT this massive concrete and steel-framed 47-story skyscraper imploded into its own footprint in less than seven seconds. Its rapid implosion had all of the characteristics of a controlled demolition, and the World Trade Center leaseholder, Larry Silverstein, stated in so many words that the building had been collapsed by demolition. It takes weeks, if not months, to prepare the demolition of a building as large as WTC 7; this implosion could not have been engineered and implemented in seven chaotic hours on September 11^th. Therefore, a question emerges:

Who had the means and expertise to engineer such a demolition and acquire needed materiel, and who had access to WTC Building 7 PRIOR TO September 11, 2001 in order to place the explosives?

Video :

300 Changes In The Bible :: Corruption of Bible

300 Changes In The NIV & Other Modern Bible Versions

The following table lists 300 verses that have been changed in the seven most popular versions. THE SEVEN MOST POPULAR VERSIONS NI New International Version NAS New American Standard Version NKJ New King James Version RS Revised Standard Version NRS New Revised Standard Version LB The Living Bible NC New Century Version REM=Removed; CHG=Changed VERSE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE CHANGE IN… Matt. 1:25 REM “Firstborn” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 5:22 REM “without a cause” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 5:44 REM 12 WORDS “bless them that curse you…” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 6:13 REM LAST 14 WORDS (For thine is the kingdom…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 6:27 CHG “cubit to his stature” TO “hour to his life” et. al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 6:33 REM “of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 8:29 REM “Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 9:13 REM “to repentance” (see also Mark 2:17) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 11:23 REM hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 12:6 REM “one greater” TO “something greater” NAS, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 12:35 REM “of the heart” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 12:40 CHG “whale” TO “fish”, sea monster NI, NAS, NKJ, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 12:47 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, RS, NRS, Matt. 13:51 REM “Lord” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 15:8 REM “draweth nigh unto me with their mouth” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 16:3 REM “o ye hypocrites” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 16:18 REM hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 16:20 REM “Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 17:21 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 18:11 REM ENTIRE VERSE (key verse) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 18:26 REM and worshipped him (for Jesus) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 19:9 REM LAST 11 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 19:17 CHG “Why callest thou me good” TO “Why do you ask me about what is good” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 19:17 REM “God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS Matt. 20:7 REM “and whatsoever is right that shall ye receive” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 20:16 REM “for many be called but few chosen” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 20:20 CHG “worshipping him” TO “kneeling down” NI, NAS, RS, NRS Matt. 20:22 REM 12 WORDS “baptized with Christ’s baptism” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 21:44 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 23:14 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Matt. 23:33 CHG damnation TO condemn, et. al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 24:36 ADD “nor the Son” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 24:36 CHG “my Father” TO “the Father” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 25:13 REM “wherein the Son of man cometh” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB Matt. 27:35 REM LAST 25 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 27:54 CHG “the Son of God” TO “a son of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 28:2 REM “from the door” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Matt. 28:9 REM “And as they went to tell his disciples” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 1:1 REM the Son of God NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Mark 1:2 CHG “prophets” TO “Isaiah” (blatant LIE) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 1:14 REM “of the kingdom” (gospel … of God) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 1:31 REM “immediately” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 2:17 REM “to repentance” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Mark 3:29 CHG “eternal damnation” TO “eternal sin”, et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 6:11 REM LAST 23 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Mark 7:8 REM LAST 15 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 7:16 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 9:24 REM “Lord” (refers to Jesus) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 9:44 REM ENTIRE VERSE (about hell) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 9:46 REM ENTIRE VERSE (about hell) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 9:49 REM “and every sacrifice shall be salted with salt” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 10:21 REM “take up the cross” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 10:24 REM “for them that trust in riches” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Mark 11:10 REM “that cometh in the name of the Lord NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 11:26 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 12:23 REM “when they shall rise” NI, RS, NRS, LB, Mark 12:40 CHG greater damnation TO punished most severely”, greater condemnation” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 13:6 CHG I am Christ TO I am He, the One NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 13:14 REM “spoken of by Daniel the prophet” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 13:33 REM “and pray” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 14:68 REM “and the cock crew” NI, NAS, RS Mark 15:28 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Mark 16:9-20 REM ENTIRE LAST 12 VERSES of Mark 16! NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 1:28 REM “blessed art thou among women” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 2:14 CHG good will toward men TO to men on whom his favor rests” et al NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 2:22 CHG “her” TO “their” (makes Jesus a sinner) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Luke 2:33 CHG “Joseph” TO “his father” (attacks virgin birth) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Luke 2:43 CHG “Joseph and his mother” TO “parents” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 4:4 REM “but by every word of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 4:8 REM “get thee behind me, Satan” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 4:18 REM 8 WORDS “he hath sent me to heal…” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Luke 4:41 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 6:48 CHG “founded upon a rock” TO “well built” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 9:54 REM “even as Elijah did” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 9:55 REM 9 WORDS “ye know not what manner of spirit…” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 9:56 REM FIRST 16 WORDS For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 9:57 REM Lord NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 10:15 REM hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Luke 11:2 REM 15 WORDS from Lords prayer NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 11:4 REM but deliver us from evil (Lord’s prayer) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 11:29 REM “the prophet” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 16:23 REM “hell” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 17:36 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 21:4 REM “cast in unto the offerings of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 21:8 CHG I am Christ TO I am He, the One NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 22:64 REM “they struck him on the face” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Luke 23:17 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 23:38 REM “letters of Greek,Latin, Hebrew” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 23:42 REM “Lord” (thief on the cross – getting saved!) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Luke 24:6 REM “He is not here, but is risen” RS, NRS Luke 24:49 REM “of Jerusalem” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB John 1:14, 18 REM “begotten”(refers to Jesus) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 1:27 REM “is preferred before me” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 3:13 REM “which is in heaven” (refers to Jesus) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 3:15 REM “should not perish” (believeth in him…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 3:16 REM “begotten” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 3:18 REM “begotten” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 4:24 CHG God is a Spirit TO God is Spirit NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 4:42 REM “the Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 5:3 REM LAST 7 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 5:4 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 5:16 REM “and sought to slay him” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 5:29 CHG damnation TO condemn, judgement NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 6:47 REM “on Me” (He that believeth…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC John 6:69 CHG “Christ, the Son of the living God” TO “Holy One of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 7:53-8:11 REM VERSES 7:53 – 8:11 NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 8;9 REM “being convicted by their own conscience” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 8:47 REM “heareth God’s words” TO “hears what God says” NI, NC John 8:59 REM LAST 10 WORDS “going through the midst… NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 9:4 CHG “I must work the works” TO “We must work the works” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 9:35 CHG “Son of God” TO Son of Man , Messiah NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 11:41 REM “For the place where the dead was laid” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 14:2 CHG “mansions” TO “rooms”, “dwelling places” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 14:16 CHG Comforter TO Helper, Counselor, et. al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC John 16:16 REM “because I go to the Father” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC John 17:12 REM “in the world” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 1:3 CHG “infallible” TO “convincing” et al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 2:30 REM “he would raise up Christ NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 2:31 REM “hell” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Acts 2:38 CHG remission of sins TO forgiveness of sins NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 4:27,30 CHG “holy child” TO “holy servant” (attacks deity) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 7:30 REM “of the Lord” (angel of the Lord) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 7:37 REM “Him shall ye hear” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 8:37 REM ENTIRE VERSE (major salvation verse) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 9:5 REM “it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 10:6 REM “he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 15:11 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 15:18 CHG beginning of the world TO …eternity, …ages NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 15:34 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 16:31 REM “Christ” (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 17:16 CHG “stirred” TO “provoked”, distressed et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 17:22 CHG “Mars Hill” TO” Areopagus” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Acts 17:22 REM “superstitious” TO “religious” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 17:26 REM “blood” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 17:29 CHG Godhead TO Divine Nature , divine being NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 19:35 REM worshipper NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 20:21 REM Christ NI, NRS, NC Acts 20:24 REM “none of these things move me. . .” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 20:25 REM “of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB Acts 23:9 REM “let us not fight against God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 24:7 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Acts 24:14 CHG heresy TO sect NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB Acts 24:15 REM “of the dead” (Resurrection) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB Acts 28:16 REM 11 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Acts 28:29 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 1:3 REM “Jesus Christ our Lord” NI, NAS, RS, NRS Romans 1:16 REM “of Christ” (gospel of Christ) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Romans 1:18 CHG “hold the truth” TO “suppress the truth” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 1:25 CHG “changed the truth” TO “exchanged the truth” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 1:29 REM “fornication” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 5:8 CHG commendeth to demonstrates , et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 6:8 CHG we be dead TO we died NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 6:11 REM our Lord NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Romans 8:1 REM LAST 10 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 9:28 REM “in righteousness” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 10:15 REM LAST 9 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 10:17 CHG “word of God” TO word of Christ NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 11:6 REM “LAST 18 WORDS ARE OMITTED” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 13:2 CHG damnation TO judgment et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 13:9 REM “Thou shall not bear false witness” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 14:6 REM 15 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 14:10 CHG “the judgement seat of Christ” TO “God’s judgment seat” et al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 14:21 REM “or is offended, or is made weak” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 14:23 CHG damned TO condemned NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 15:8 REM Jesus NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Romans 15:19 REM “of God” NI, NAS, RS, LB, NC Romans 15:29 REM “of the gospel” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 16:18 CHG good words and fair speeches TO smooth talk and flattery NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Romans 16:24 REM ENTIRE VERSE NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC I Cor. 1:21 CHG “foolishness of preaching” TO “foolishness of the message preached” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 1:22 REM “require” TO “request”, ask (Jews require a sign) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 5:4 REM “Christ” (TWICE) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 5:7 REM “for us” (Christ sacrificed) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC I Cor. 6:9 CHG effeminate TO male prostitutes et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 6:20 REM “and in your spirit, which are God’s” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC I Cor. 7:5 REM “fasting” (with prayer) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 7:39 REM “by the law” (The wife is bound) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 9:1 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 9:27 CHG “I keep my body” TO “I beat my body” et al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 9:27 CHG “castaway” TO “disqualified” et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 10:28 REM LAST 10 WORDS (“the earth is the Lord’s…”) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 11:11 REM “in the Lord” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 11:24 REM “take eat . . . broken…” (Lord’s Supper) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 11:29 CHG damnation TO judgment (Lord s Supper) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 11:29 REM “unworthily” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC I Cor. 14:33 CHG “author of confusion” TO “a God of disorder” et al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 15:47 CHG Lord from heaven TO man from heaven NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 15:55 CHG “grave” TO “Hades”, death NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 16:22 REM “Jesus Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC I Cor. 16:23 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor. 2:10 CHG “person of Christ” TO “presence of Christ” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor. 2:17 CHG “corrupt” TO “peddle”, sell (word of God) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor.4:6 REM “Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, LB, NC 2 Cor. 4:10 REM “the Lord” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor. 5:17 CHG “creature” TO “creation” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor. 5:18 REM “Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC 2 Cor.10:5 CHG “Casting down imaginations” TO “We demolish arguments” et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor.11:6 CHG rude in speech TO untrained in speech NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Cor.11:31 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS Gal. 2:20 REM “nevertheless I LBe” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Gal. 3:1 REM that ye should not obey the truth NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Gal.3:17 REM “in Christ” (confirmed…of God in Christ) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Gal. 4:7 REM “through Christ” (heir of God through Christ) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Gal. 5:4 CHG “no effect” TO “estranged from”, alienated NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Gal. 6:15 REM “For in Christ Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Gal. 6:17 REM “the Lord” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Ephesians 1:6 REM “accepted in the beloved” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Ephesians 3:9 REM “by Jesus Christ” (who created all things by) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Ephesians 3:14 REM “of our Lord Jesus Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Ephesians 5:9 CHG fruit of the Spirit TO fruit of the light NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Ephesians 5:30 REM “of his flesh, and of his bones” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Philippians 2:6 CHG “thought it not robbery to be equal with God TO did not consider equality with God something to be grasped et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Philippians 2:7 CHG “made” TO “emptied” NAS, RS, NRS, LB, Philippians 3:8 CHG dung TO rubbish , trash NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Philippians 3:16 REM LAST 13 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Philippians 4:13 CHG through Christ TO through him NI, NAS, RS, NRS Colossians 1:2 REM “and the Lord Jesus Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Colossians 1:14 REM “through His blood” (redemption through…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Colossians 1:28 REM “Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Colossians 3:6 REM “on the children of disobedience” NI, NAS, RS, LB, NC 1 Thess. 1:1 REM LAST 9 WORDS (from God our father…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Thess. 2:19 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS 1 Thess. 3:11 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Thess. 3:13 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Thess. 5:22 CHG “all appearance of evil” TO “every form of evil” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Thess. 1:8 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS 2 Thess. 1:12 REM Christ NI, NAS, RS, NRS 1 Timothy 1:1 REM Lord NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC 1 Timothy 1:17 REM “wise” (the only wise God) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 2:7 REM “in Christ” (…the truth in Christ) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 3:16 CHG “God” TO “he” (God manifest in the flesh) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 4:12 REM “in spirit” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 5:21 REM Lord NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC 1 Timothy 6:1 CHG blasphemed TO spoken against et al. NI, NAS, RS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 6:5 CHG gain is godliness TO godliness is a means of gain et al. NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 6:5 REM “from such withdraw thyself” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC 1 Timothy 6:10 CHG “root of all evil” TO “root of all kinds of evil” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 6:19 CHG “eternal life” TO “the life that is truly life” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Timothy 6:20 CHG “science” TO “knowledge” NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Timothy 1:11 REM “of the gentiles” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC 2 Timothy 2:15 REM “study” (only command to study the word) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Timothy 3:3 CHG of those that are good TO good NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC 2 Timothy 4:1 REM “the Lord” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Timothy 4:22 REM “Jesus Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Hebrews 1:3 CHG “by himself purged our sins” TO “provided purification for sins” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Hebrews 2:7 REM LAST 10 WORDS (and didst set him over the works…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Hebrews 3:1 REM “Christ Jesus” (High Priest of our…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Hebrews 7:21 REM “after the order of Melchisedec” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Hebrews 10:34 REM “in heaven” (ye have in heaven a better) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Hebrews 11:11 REM “was delivered of a child” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC James 5:16 CHG “faults” TO “sins” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC 1 Peter 1:22 REM “through the Spirit” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 2:2 REM “of the word” (sincere milk of the word) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 2:2 CHG “grow thereby” TO “grow up in your salvation” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 3:15 CHG the Lord God TO Christ as Lord et al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 4:1 REM “for us” (Christ hath suffered for us) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 4:14 REM LAST 15 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 5:10 REM “Jesus” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 5:11 REM “glory (to Him be glory and dominion) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 Peter 5:14 REM Jesus NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Peter 2:1 CHG damnable TO destructive NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Peter 2:17 REM “for ever” (darkness is reserved for ever) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 2 Peter 3:9 REM “us” TO “you” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 1:7 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 3:16 REM “of God” (love of God) NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 4:3 REM “Christ is come in the flesh” (antichrist) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 4:9 REM “begotten” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 4:19 REM him (We love him, because he first…) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 5:7 REM LAST 15 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 5:8 REM FIRST 9 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 5:13 REM LAST 13 WORDS NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC 1 John 5:13 ADD continue to (denys eternal security) NKJ 2 John 1:3 REM the Lord NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Jude 1:25 REM “wise” (Referring to God) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 1:8 REM “the beginning and the ending” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 1:9 REM Christ (TWICE) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 1:11 REM “I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last . NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 1:18 REM hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 2:13 CHG Satan’s seat TO Satan s throne NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 2:15 REM “which thing I hate” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 5:14 REM “Him that liveth for ever and ever” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 6:8 REM Hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 6:17 CHG his wrath TO their wrath NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 8:13 CHG “angel” TO “eagle” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 11:15 CHG “kingdoms” TO “kingdom” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 11:17 REM “and art to come” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 12:12 REM “inhabiters of” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 12:17 REM “Christ” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 14:5 REM “before the throne of God” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 15:3 CHG King of saints TO King of the ages et al. NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 16:5 REM and shalt be (refers to deity of Jesus) NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 16:7 CHG And I heard another out of the altar say TO And I heard the altar respond NI, NAS, RS, NRS Rev. 16:17 REM “of heaven” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 20:9 REM “from God out of” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 20:12 CHG “God” TO “throne” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 20:13 REM hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 20:14 REM hell NI, NAS, NKJ, RS, NRS, NC Rev. 21:24 REM “of them which are saved” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 22:14 CHG “do his commandments” TO “wash their robes” NI, NAS, RS, NRS, LB, NC Rev. 22:21 REM Christ NI, NAS, RS, NRS, NC

Character of Prophet Muhammad [pbuh]

Virgin Mary in Holy Bible and Holy Quran

Virgin Mary in Bible and Holy Quran

Virgin Mary is as seen in Christianity and Islam; the sources are mainly the Bible and Quran. They are both mostly similar considering Mary.

Special!

Christianity (Bible)	Islam (Quran)
“The angel went to her and said, ‘Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.” Luke 1:28	“Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah has chosen you and purified you – chosen you above the women of all nations.” Quran 3:42

Encounter with the Angel

“Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, you have found favor with God. You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.” Luke 1:29-31

“Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah gives you glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah”; Quran 3:45

How!

“How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.” Luke 1:34-5

“She said: ‘O my Lord! how shall I have a son when no man has touched me?’ He said: “Even so: Allah creates what He wills: when He has decreed a Plan, He but says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is!” Quran 3:47

A Miracle at The Same Time

“Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be barren is in her sixth month. For nothing is impossible with God.” Luke 1:36-7

Praying: “O my Lord! Infirm indeed are my bones, and the hair of my head glistens with grey: but never am I unblest, O my Lord, in my prayer to You!…my wife is barren: so give me an heir as from Yourself, “(One that) will (truly) represent me, and represent the posterity of Jacob; and make him, O my Lord! one with whom You are well-pleased!” (His prayer was answered): “O Zakariya! We give you good news of a son: his name shall be Yahya (John the Baptist)…” He said: “O my Lord! how shall I have a son, when my wife is barren and I have grown quite decrepit from old age?” He said: “So (it will be) : your Lord says, ‘That is easy for Me: I indeed created you before, when you had been nothing!” Quran 19:4-9

Creation of Adam and Jesus

“God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” Genesis 1:27

“The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: “Be”: and he was.” Quran 3:59

The Birth

…”the time came for the baby to be born, and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger”… Luke 1:6-7

“So she conceived him, and she retired with him to a remote place. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk o a palm-tree: she cried (in her anguish): “Ah! would that I had died before this! would that I had been a thing forgotten and out of sight! But (a voice) cried to her from beneath the (palm-tree) :”Do not grieve! for your Lord has provided a rivulet beneath you; “And shake toward yourself the trunk of the palm-tree: it will let fall fresh ripe dates upon you.” Quran 19:22-5

The Other Mircales of Jesus in the Quran

“So eat and drink and cool (your) eye. And if you see any man, say, ‘I have vowed a fast to (Allah) Most Gracious, and this day I will not enter into any talk with any human being.’ At length she brought the (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: “O Mary! truly an amazing thing you have brought! “O sister of Aaron! your father was not a man of evil, nor your mother an unchaste woman!” But she pointed to the babe. They said: “how can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle?” He said: “I am indeed a servant of Allah: He has given me Revelation and made me a prophet; “And He has made me blessed wheresoever I be, and has enjoined on me Prayer and Charity as long as I live; “(He) has made me kind to my mother, and not overbearing or miserable.” Quran 19:26-32

“Is ‘King James’ Version the Actual Bible

Note: The word “Bible” comes from the Koine Greek word “biblios” and it simply means the same as the word “book” in English. Nowhere in the Bible do we find the word “Bible.” However, it is interesting to note the word “kitab” (Bible in Arabic) appears many times in the Quran, referring to the Bible and the People of the Book (Jews and Christians).

Let me begin by saying that the King James “version” of the Bible is in English. There was no English language until the year 1066 AD when the Normans invaded the Saxons. Therefore the English Bible cannot be anything like what any of the prophets spoke or understood, as it did not exist in their times.

Next, my grandfather, who was a devout and wonderful Christian man gave a gift of the Holy Bible to my sisters and I almost fifty years ago. It was an authorized version of the Bible, being The Revised Standard Version of the Bible which was a revised version of the American Standard Version, published in 1901, which was a version of the King James Version, published in 1611, which was revised and corrected for the first time in 1612, etc. I was very much impressed with the easier to read text and clarification of some of the wording which was presented in this version and began to read the Bible on a daily basis for hours at a time. The removal of the Elizabethton English terms, phrases and expressions made the Bible a more accessible and understandable and intimate Book for me. But that is not all the RSV did for me and many others, as well.

My love and respect for the Word of God increased the more that I spent time reading and understanding the message. The Bible became my most prized and respected book in my life. I often turned to it throughout the rest of my life in times of joy, happiness, sadness, troubles and pain. It was my compass, my road map, my weather vane and my friend. However, there were still some problems with this IMPROVED VERSION of the Holy Bible. It began to disturb and concern me to the extent that I made consultation with my father, who was also an ordained minister and student of the Bible since childhood. Based on his research and background in the origin and sources for modern day Christianity, I began to go deeper into the problems which had plagued my thinking and faith since childhood.

I prayed to Almighty God and then found the answers to some of the problems were spelled out very clearly in the very beginning of the exact same book. I have that book lying in front of me on my desk as I write this article and would like to quote to you from some of the PREFACE page iii and iv:

“The King James Version has with good reason been termed ‘the noblest monument of English prose.’ Its revisers in 1881 expressed admiration of ‘its simplicity, its dignity, its power, its happy turns of express… the music of its cadences, and the felicities of its rhythm.’ It entered, as no other book has, into the making of the personal character and the public institutions of the English-speaking peoples. We owe to it an incalculable debt.”

“Yet the King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for a revision of the English translation. The task was undertaken, by authority of the Church of England, in 1870. The English Revised Version of the Bibles was published in 1881-1885; and the American Standard Version, its variant embodying the preferences of the American scholars associated in the work, was published in 1901.”

“Because of the unhappy experience with unauthorized publications in the two decades between 1881 and 1901, which tampered with the text of the English Revised Version in the supposed interest of the American public, the American Standard Version was copyrighted, to protect the text from unauthorized changes. In 1928 this copyright was acquired by the International Council of Religious Education, and thus passed into the ownership of the churches of the United States and Canada which were associated in this Council through their boards of education and publication.”

“…. decision was reached that there is need for a thorough revision of the version of 1901..”"In 1937 the revision was authorized by vote of the Council.”

“Thirty-two scholars have served as members of the Committee charged with making the revision, and they have secured the review and counsel of an Advisory Board of fifty representatives of the co-operating denominations.”

“Each section has submitted its work to the scrutiny of the members of the charter of the Committee requires that all changes be agreed upon by a two-thirds vote of the total membership of the Committee.”

“The problem of establishing the correct Hebrew and Aramaic text of the Old testament is very different from the corresponding problem in the New Testament.”

“For the New Testament we have a large number of Greek manuscripts, preserving many variant forms of the text. Some of them were made only two or three centuries later than the original composition of the books.”

“For the Old Testament only late manuscripts survive, all (with the exception of the Dead Sea Texts of Isaiah and Habakkuk and some fragments of other books) based on a standardized form of the text established many centuries after the books were written.”

“The present revision is based on the consonantal Hebrew and Aramaic text as fixed early in the Christian era and revised by Jewish scholars (the ‘Masoretes’) of the sixth to ninth centuries. The vowel signs, which were added by the Masoretes, are accepted also in the main, but where a more probable and convincing reading can be obtained by assuming different vowels, this has been done.”

“… vowel points are less ancient and [less] reliable than the consonants.”

“Departures from the consonantal text of the best manuscripts have been made only where it seems clear that errors in copying had been made before the text was standardized.”

“Most of the corrections adopted are based on the ancient versions [translations into Greek Aramaic, Syriac, and Latin], which were made before the time of the Masoretic revision and therefore reflect earlier forms of the text.”

“Sometimes it is evident that the text has suffered in transmission, but none of the versions provides a satisfactory restoration. Here we can only follow the best judgment of competent scholars as to the most probable reconstruction of the original text.”

“Many difficulties and obscurities, of course, remain.”

“Where the choice between two meanings is particularly difficult or doubtful, we have given an alternative rendering in a footnote.”

“If in the judgment of the Committee the meaning of a passage is quite uncertain or obscure, either because of corruption in the text or because of the inadequacy of our present knowledge of the language, that fact is indicated by a note.”

“It should not be assumed, however, that the Committee was entirely sure or unanimous concerning every rendering not so indicated.”

“To record all minority views was obviously out of the question.”

“The King James Version of the New Testament was based upon a Greek text that was marred by mistakes, containing the accumulated errors of fourteen centuries of manuscript copying.”

“It was essentially the Greek text of the New Testament as edited by Beza, 1589, who closely followed that published by Erasmus, 1516-1535, which was based upon a few medieval manuscripts.”

“The earliest and best of the eight manuscripts which Erasmus consulted was from the tenth century, and [yet] he made the least use of it because it differed most from the commonly received text; Beza had access to two manuscripts of great value, dating from the fifth and sixth centuries, but he made very little use of them because they differed from the text published by Erasmus.”

“We now possess many more ancient manuscripts of the new Testament, and are far better equipped to seek to recover the original wording of the Greek text. The evidence for the text of the books of the New Testament is better that for any other ancient book, both in the number of extant manuscripts and in the nearness of the date of some of these manuscripts to the date when the book was originally written.”

The words are in plain English. The second paragraph says it all, “Yet, the King James Version has grave defects.

Therefore, we must conclude the “King James Version” is NOT the Actual Bible sent by God to mankind.